Embedded, Digital, and Interfaces

Model class: Exact ideal relationship

PWM frequency and resolution planner

Calculate ideal edge-aligned PWM frequency, duty steps, and effective duty resolution from timer clock, prescaler, and counter top.

Interactive engine

Start with the stated conditions.

Values stay in this browser. Choose a representative scenario, then calculate deliberately.

Example ready

Calculate to inspect the result.

The result will identify the direct answer, assumptions, and any warning that changes the next decision.

Next decision:Reset RC timing planner

Assumptions to check

  • The entered PWM-timer-planner values represent the stated operating condition.
  • Values are evaluated in the declared lumped or first-pass model.
  • A nominal calculation is not a component qualification or safety approval.

What this PWM-timer-planner calculation establishes

Calculate ideal edge-aligned PWM frequency, duty steps, and effective duty resolution from timer clock, prescaler, and counter top. The useful result is the stated electrical quantity and the decision it supports, not an unstated claim about a finished product. This engine keeps the governing relationship visible so an input, unit, condition, or model boundary can be reviewed before a value becomes a component or layout choice.

PWM frequency is timer clock divided by prescaler times duty steps, where duty steps equal the counter top value plus one; effective resolution is the base-2 logarithm of the duty steps. Treat the number as a first-pass result for the declared operating point. When a source, load, temperature, frequency, waveform, component tolerance, or measurement condition changes, repeat the calculation at the relevant corner rather than assuming the nominal answer persists.

Worked decision context

48 MHz edge-aligned PWM with prescaler 1 and top 4799 gives 10 kHz and 4800 duty steps, about 12.23 effective bits. That example verifies the equation and illustrates the scale of the result, but it does not select a part by itself. Compare the result with available values, ratings, tolerance bands, and the receiving circuit or physical environment before implementation.

Use the primary output to identify the binding constraint. If it leaves little margin, document which input dominates and use selected-part data, a higher-fidelity model, simulation, or measurement. This is especially important when a small numerical difference changes a thermal, timing, noise, or reliability decision.

Limits and validation handoff

This is the ideal edge-aligned timer relationship for one prescaler and counter-top pair. Dead-time insertion, center-aligned modes, and clock-source tolerance change the achievable result. The calculation does not silently include omitted parasitics, installation conditions, manufacturing variation, or product policy. Those conditions can be decisive even when the arithmetic is exact for the selected model.

Record inputs, units, model assumptions, and the intended decision with the result. Verify the leading risk against the selected component data sheet and a representative measurement when the circuit has consequential energy, high voltage, safety, compliance, or reliability requirements.

Common mistakes

  • Treating a nominal result as a guaranteed operating limit.
  • Mixing a data-sheet value from one condition with a calculation at another.
  • Selecting a component before checking rating, tolerance, and the physical implementation.

Model limit and handoff

Keep the entered PWM-timer-planner conditions with the calculation, then validate the binding limit using the selected component, physical implementation, and representative operating corner.

FAQs

Is this result sufficient to approve a design?

No. It resolves the stated first-pass decision and names the checks that need selected-part data, a more complete model, or measurement.